Hotel Palace Berlin · 10–11 February 2027
Who governs. · Who decides. · Who is accountable.
Why
The room for the leaders already carrying the responsibility.
Every board in life sciences is asked the same question. Who is accountable for the AI outcome. The role most boards will appoint does not yet exist at scale. The technology is deployed. The governance is not.
The white space is the room that holds the conversation differently. Closed-door. By invitation. Early. A circle for the leaders preparing for the role before the queue forms.
AIO Circle is that room. Senior leadership preparing for AI accountability — convened across drug discovery, R&D, manufacturing and supply. Faculty drawn from the leaders already carrying the responsibility, with or without the title.
In the Circle. Announced in cadence with the programme. The corridor where AI ambition becomes outcome — or breaks. Entry is by invitation, nomination or direct introduction. What is decided does not stay in the room.
The thesis
Technology moves faster than leadership. Boards know they will appoint the role — few yet have the candidate. Models now generate release-critical calls no one has formally governed. Pilots without accountability stall.
AIO Circle convenes the leaders preparing for that role — across discovery, development, manufacturing and supply. The Circle closes the gap.
Who governs. Who decides. Who is accountable. Three questions the room must hold before the queue forms.
AIO Circle · 2027